Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured overview with a sequenced workflow, explicit validation step, and a completion-gates checklist; its main limitation is that the guidance, while specific, stops short of copy-paste-ready examples or an explicit error-recovery loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean ~34 lines with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Tool routing, Workflow, Completion gates, Boundaries, Delivery) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor rather than the slightly-padded score-4 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, specific guidance — naming exact tokens ('type, spacing, color, radius, and motion'), exact states ('hover, focus, active, disabled, loading, empty, success, and error'), and a concrete tool-routing table — so it is mostly actionable with only minor gaps; it stops short of fully copy-paste-ready examples, so not score 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step workflow is clearly sequenced and includes an explicit validation step ('Validate contrast, semantics, motion, and responsiveness') plus a 'Completion gates' checklist, fitting the 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present' anchor; it lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop, so it does not reach score 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, has no bundle files requiring external references, and is organized into clearly labeled sections (Purpose, Tool routing, Workflow, Completion gates, Boundaries, Delivery); per the simple-skills scoring note this qualifies for a 5 with well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |