Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, lean instruction skill with concrete tool routing, a clear sequenced workflow, and validation gates; its main weakness is the lack of illustrative edit examples and an explicit feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence with no over-explanation of concepts, but the 'Purpose' section repeats the frontmatter description verbatim and the copyright line adds non-essential tokens, leaving minor trims below the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance for an instruction-only skill — a tool-routing table naming exact tools, rules like 'Make the lightest edit that solves each issue' and 'use the exact source hash' — with only minor gaps such as no before/after edit examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step workflow is clearly sequenced and the 'Completion gates' section provides validation checkpoints for the editing operation; it stops short of an explicit validate-fix-retry loop, so it is one notch below the full-checkpoint anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no need for external references, the body is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Tool routing, Workflow, Completion gates, Boundaries, Delivery), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |