Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a reasonably well-structured, actionable analytical workflow for reconstructing poor questions into higher-order decision questions. Its main weaknesses are some definitional padding and the absence of validation checkpoints and a complete worked output example.
Suggestions
Tighten or move the '目标识别' and '高阶问题定义标准' definition/example blocks into a reference file to reduce conciseness overhead, keeping the core workflow lean.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after step 4 (e.g. 'Verify the reconstructed question satisfies all three 高阶问题逻辑要素 before output') to strengthen workflow clarity.
Include one full worked example showing input 差问题 → intermediate analysis → final reconstructed 好问题 to make the actionability fully concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly task-specific guidance but includes padded definition sections (e.g. '高阶问题的特征' and '目标识别' with worked examples that re-explain the concept), matching the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor; it is above 2 because the bulk is actionable rather than generic Claude knowledge. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps give concrete required outputs per dimension (具体表现, 2-3替代选项, 对比结论, 机会成本) and explicit ordering, fitting 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps'; it is not 5 because there is no full worked end-to-end example of a restructured '好问题' output. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence 1→目标识别→2→3→4 is explicit and ordering is enforced ('不得跳步'), but there are no validation/verification checkpoints (e.g. checking the restructured question against the 高阶问题定义标准), matching 'steps listed but checkpoints missing'; the task is analytical rather than destructive so it stays at 3 rather than dropping. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized SKILL.md with clearly headed sections (### numbered steps, 约束条件, 输出) and no external bundle files, fitting 'good structure; minor organization gaps'; the inconsistent mix of '### ' numbered steps with '#' mid-document subsections (目标识别, 高阶问题定义标准) keeps it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |