rewrite-problem
Transforms vague or ill-defined questions into clear, structured, and actionable "good problems" by extracting the core objective, identifying comparison dimensions, and applying structured reasoning. Use when a user wants to compare multiple options, evaluate trade-offs, make a decision between alternatives, or asks questions like "which is better", "pros and cons", "help me decide", "how should I choose", or "what are the trade-offs". Produces a rewritten problem statement with explicit comparison dimensions, a structured evaluation framework, and a decision-ready output format.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:Leo-stone-dot/my_life_agent --skill rewrite-problem100
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that hits all the key criteria. It provides specific concrete actions, includes a comprehensive 'Use when...' clause with natural user phrases, and carves out a distinct niche around decision-making and comparison problems. The description uses proper third-person voice throughout and balances detail with clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'extracting the core objective', 'identifying comparison dimensions', 'applying structured reasoning', and produces 'rewritten problem statement with explicit comparison dimensions, a structured evaluation framework, and a decision-ready output format'. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (transforms vague questions into structured problems, extracts objectives, identifies dimensions) AND when (explicit 'Use when...' clause with multiple trigger scenarios and example phrases). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural user phrases: 'which is better', 'pros and cons', 'help me decide', 'how should I choose', 'what are the trade-offs', plus conceptual triggers like 'compare multiple options', 'evaluate trade-offs', 'make a decision between alternatives'. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused on decision-making and comparison problems with distinct triggers like 'pros and cons', 'trade-offs', 'help me decide' - unlikely to conflict with general coding, document, or data skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that efficiently teaches a structured problem-reframing methodology. It combines a clear template, actionable steps, explicit reasoning form labels, and a concrete example that demonstrates the full workflow. The bilingual approach (Chinese template with English structure) is intentional and adds value for the target use case.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient, presenting only the essential framework, criteria, and one concrete example. No unnecessary explanations of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete template sentence, clear 4-step instructions, explicit criteria definitions, a complete worked example, and a specific output format. Claude can immediately apply this framework. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-step process is clearly sequenced (Extract → Identify → Analyze → Rewrite), with explicit guidance on labeling reasoning forms. The acceptance criteria template provides a clear validation checkpoint. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a skill of this size (~50 lines), the content is well-organized with clear sections (acceptance criteria, instructions, definitions, example, output format). No external references needed; structure is appropriate for scope. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.