Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable workflow with concrete commands and an explicit feedback loop, though it carries some generic advice padding and the top-level task sequence lacks explicit per-step validation gates. Navigation and reference signaling are solid for a single-file skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete commands, but generic platitudes like 'Handle edge cases and error conditions' and 'Write tests as you go' add padding that could be trimmed, fitting the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete executable commands (git status, bun run test:run, bun run typecheck), specific conventions (#src/* alias, *.test.ts, loadFixture()), and real file paths, with only minor gaps keeping it below fully copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are clear (numbered task list and an implement->test->fix->typecheck->lint->repeat loop with a feedback step), but the main task-list steps lack explicit validation checkpoints between them, so it sits below the explicit-validation anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to ARCHITECTURE.md and CODE_STYLE.md; at ~115 lines it is larger than the simple-skill case but structure and navigation are good with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |