Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and well-structured with copy-paste-ready commands, but it lacks a post-creation validation step and carries some over-explanation in the architecture section. For a simple single-purpose skill it is solid, with minor tightening and a verification checkpoint needed to reach the top band.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step after creation, e.g., 'Verify the file exists at `.agents/plans/{id}-{slug}.md` and the frontmatter rendered correctly'.
Trim the Architecture Considerations section (or defer fully to the already-referenced `.agents/ARCHITECTURE.md`) to remove tangential explanation.
Replace placeholder slugs in the command examples with one fully worked end-to-end example to lift actionability to copy-paste-ready for a real case.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete commands and a clear task list, but the Architecture Considerations section and phrases like 'This is crucial' add explanation that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides three concrete, executable command forms (direct, heredoc, pipe) plus the output file format, with only minor gaps (placeholder slugs and an assumed `bun` runtime). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step sequence is clear, but there is no validation/verification checkpoint after file creation, which caps workflow clarity at 3 for a write operation. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with well-organized sections and clearly signaled external references; the duplicated architecture guidance is a minor organization gap keeping it from a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |