Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, actionable, and well-structured with executable examples covering the main usage variants. Its main weakness is the absence of any verification step to confirm the scratch file was created successfully.
Suggestions
Add a verification checkpoint after file creation, e.g. 'Confirm the file exists at .agents/scratches/{id}-{slug}.md before reporting success.'
Tighten the 'Usage' and 'Guidelines' sections, which restate information already conveyed by the examples, to remove minor redundancy.
Clarify how the slug should be derived or validated when the user's intent is ambiguous, to strengthen the workflow's first step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete command examples and minimal padding; only small parts like the 'Usage' bullets and 'Guidelines' repeat info already shown, so it sits at 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides three copy-paste-ready executable invocations (direct, heredoc, pipe) plus a concrete file-format example, fully covering common cases as the 'fully executable; copy-paste ready' anchor requires. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced task list exists (determine slug → gather content → create file) with explicit command options, but there is no validation checkpoint (e.g. verifying the file was created or the slug is valid); this is a single-purpose skill, so it sits just below the explicit-validation anchor at 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into focused sections (Task, Usage, Creating the File, File Format, Guidelines) with no nested references and no bundle files to split out; as a simple skill this matches 'good structure; most content appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |