Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and highly actionable, with concrete commands, a clear sequenced workflow, explicit feedback loops, and stopping conditions; its main weakness is mild redundancy across the task, before-coding, and autonomous-workflow sections that could be consolidated.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence without explaining known concepts, but the 'Autonomous Workflow' section and 'Commands' block repeat steps 7-9 (test/typecheck/lint), and 'Before Coding' partly restates 'Your Task', so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete executable commands ('bun run test', 'bun run typecheck', 'bun run lint:fix'), specific file paths, an explicit directory-structure example, and a named tool (TodoWrite), giving copy-paste-ready guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced in 'Your Task' and the 'Autonomous Workflow' includes an explicit feedback loop (implement -> test -> fix -> typecheck -> lint -> repeat) with stopping conditions, matching the score-3 anchor for sequenced processes with validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so this is evaluated as a self-contained skill; the body is well-organized into clearly labeled sections with no nested references, satisfying the well-organized-structure criterion for the top anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |