Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a clear phased workflow, concrete scoring guidance, and properly disclosed references. Its main weakness is conciseness, as it re-explains basic SEO concepts Claude already knows.
Suggestions
Trim general-knowledge explanations (e.g., the intent-category definitions and generic difficulty-factor descriptions) down to the skill-specific scoring logic and thresholds.
Replace narrative prose in phases like Discover and Variations with tighter bullet directives to reduce token overhead.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with useful matrices and templates, but it explains general SEO concepts Claude already knows (intent definitions, generic difficulty-factor descriptions) and is padded in places that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete executable guidance: a real scoring formula (Opportunity = Volume × Intent Value / Difficulty) with numeric intent weights, filled-out templates, and a quality-bar table with specific worked examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-phase sequence is announced per phase ("[Phase X/8: Name]") and is bracketed by Input and Output Validation Checklists, giving clear sequencing with validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is an overview that points to four real, one-level-deep reference files (all confirmed present in ./references/), clearly signaled in a 'Reference Materials' section with appropriate inline pointers. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |