Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a well-sequenced, validated 8-phase workflow with good progressive disclosure to real reference files, but it carries notable verbosity in inline templates and taxonomy tables that Claude already knows. Trimming those into references would materially improve conciseness.
Suggestions
Move the full modifier list (Phase 3) and difficulty-tier table (Phase 5) into a reference file, keeping only a few illustrative examples inline.
Replace the generic intent taxonomy table in Phase 4 with a pointer to references/keyword-intent-taxonomy.md, since that file already exists.
Cut the "Tips for Success" section, which restates guidance already covered in the phases.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but includes padded templates Claude largely already knows (full modifier lists, difficulty-tier tables, intent taxonomy), which could be moved to references or trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete phases, a scoring formula `Opportunity = (Volume × Intent Value) / Difficulty`, intent-value weights, and a specific quality-bar table; mostly executable with minor gaps since live tool commands are optional. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-phase sequence with `[Phase X/8]` announcements, a dedicated Validation Checkpoints section, and a quality-bar rewrite loop give clear sequencing with explicit validation and feedback. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are one level deep, clearly signaled via a "Reference Materials" section, and all four referenced files (example-report, keyword-intent-taxonomy, keyword-prioritization-framework, topic-cluster-templates) exist in ./references/. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |