Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is well-structured, highly actionable, with strong validation feedback loops and sound progressive disclosure to real local reference files; its main weakness is length with some duplication between the Quick Start and Instructions sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the duplicated material between 'Quick Start', 'What This Skill Does', and 'Instructions' to reduce verbosity while keeping the actionable specifics.
Clarify which links are local bundle references versus broader-repo paths (e.g. skill-contract.md, state-model.md, CONNECTORS.md) so navigation depth is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Per-section content is dense and free of generic concept explanations Claude already knows, but the ~275-line body has notable duplication (Quick Start prompts overlap with the Instructions section; the 11-item 'What This Skill Does' recapitulates later 'Instructions') that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths, specific thresholds (80 lines, 25KB, 90 days, 3+ refs), executable commands (/seo:wiki-lint [--fix], 'Refresh wiki index'), and a copy-paste-ready save-results filename format give fully actionable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes are explicitly sequenced (Context Lookup Flow Steps 1-5, Memory Hygiene Checks 1-4) with a dedicated Validation Checkpoints section and feedback loops (count -> flag -> recommend archival) for destructive/batch operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that signals one-level-deep local references (promotion-demotion-rules.md, update-triggers-integration.md, examples.md, templates) with clear 'See ... for ...' cues; these files exist in ./references/ and content is appropriately split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |