Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-structured, actionable decision guide for a single tool, with only minor gaps — chiefly the absence of a complete example invocation and an explicit verification checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what a report is or how the tool works, and every line (param values, fallback rule) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable parameter guidance is given throughout (`source_strategy` values, `report_style="detailed"`, `parent_report_id`, example `user_instructions`), but no full `generate_report` invocation example is provided, leaving it just short of copy-paste-ready 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced numbered decision flow plus an explicit KB-no-results fallback hook gives a strong sequence with a checkpoint; it lacks an explicit validate-fix-retry loop, but report generation is not a destructive or batch operation so the 3-cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized sections (When to use, Decision flow, Hooks), which the simple-skill exception explicitly scores at 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |