Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured, actionable, and concise instruction content with a clear workflow and output template. The main weakness is progressive disclosure: the body points to rule/mapping/example files that do not exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (rules/decision-*.md, mappings/doc_links.yaml, AGENTS.md, examples/) so the body's references resolve and progressive disclosure actually works.
If some referenced files are not yet authored, mark them as TODO or trim the references to only files that exist, to avoid dead links.
Tighten the provenance definitions and scenario headers slightly to remove minor verbosity without losing the classification scheme.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic ClickHouse concepts; the provenance definitions and 'Read these rule files by scenario' headers could be slightly tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete numbered required-behavior list, named rule files mapped per scenario, and a copy-paste-ready structured output template with labeled fields — fully actionable instruction-based guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence from workload identification through file reading, doc attachment, provenance classification, to a structured output, with explicit uncertainty/disclosure checkpoints and a checklist-style output template. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are well-signaled and one-level-deep (rules/decision-*.md, mappings/doc_links.yaml, AGENTS.md, examples/), but none of the referenced bundle directories or files are present in the skill bundle, so the disclosure structure cannot actually resolve. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |