Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, highly actionable audit workflow with excellent sequencing and validation, weakened only by a dangling core reference (checks.md) that is not shipped in the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced checks.md (or add a references/ bundle) so the central check registry the audit depends on actually exists.
If checks.md is intentionally external, state where it lives or fold the essential check ids inline so the static audit is not blocked by a missing file.
Add a one-line note in Step 2 confirming checks.md availability, since every finding must cite a check id from it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and operational throughout — no concept teaching about OTel/Maple, just check registry pointers, severities, and routing rules; every section earns its tokens, meeting the score-3 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete grep targets (setAttribute, set_attribute), named check-id categories (RES-*, STAT-*), specific MCP tools (get_instrumentation_recommendations, list_services, service_map), and a ready report table template — fully executable guidance per the instruction-only allowance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with explicit checkpoints (show service list before auditing, report before any edit) and a validate→fix→re-verify feedback loop for destructive edits, matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-signaled one-level references to checks.md and maple-*-style skills, but the bundle has no references/scripts/assets directories — checks.md, the central registry the whole audit depends on, is referenced yet not present, so the disclosure is partially broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |