CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

maple-rust-style

Rust OpenTelemetry style for Maple: opentelemetry + opentelemetry_sdk + opentelemetry-otlp HTTP exporter, tracing-opentelemetry bridge for the tracing crate, inline endpoint + ingest key, semconv resource attributes.

66

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/maple-rust-style/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exemplary code-focused skill: complete, executable Rust and Cargo.toml that can be pasted directly into a project, with prose limited to genuinely non-obvious constraints. The only gaps are a missing verification step (confirming telemetry arrives at Maple) and inline version pins that will age.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean body where every prose note carries non-obvious information (version pairing, blocking-client requirement, rustls TLS); however, time-sensitive version numbers (0.32/0.33) are stated inline without an old-patterns/deprecated section, a minor penalty per the guidelines.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable end-to-end: a complete Cargo.toml, a copy-paste-ready init() with imports and real endpoint/key constants, a main() with shutdown calls, and a #[tracing::instrument] example covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequence (dependencies → bootstrap → business spans → coexistence) with concrete gotchas, but no explicit validation checkpoint such as verifying telemetry actually reaches Maple before shipping.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections with no nested or buried references, and no bundle files exist to verify; nothing in the body clearly belongs in a separate file, though the skill exceeds 50 lines so the simple-skill exception does not strictly apply.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A highly specific, distinctive description that names the exact crate stack and configuration choices without fluff. Its main weakness is the complete absence of a 'when to use' trigger clause, and it lacks some natural synonyms like 'telemetry' or 'observability'.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when setting up telemetry or OpenTelemetry instrumentation in a Rust project targeting Maple.'

Include natural user phrasings/synonyms such as 'telemetry', 'observability', 'traces', and 'logs' so the description matches how users actually ask for this skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the exact crate stack ('opentelemetry + opentelemetry_sdk + opentelemetry-otlp HTTP exporter'), the 'tracing-opentelemetry bridge for the tracing crate', 'inline endpoint + ingest key', and 'semconv resource attributes' — multiple concrete capabilities with comprehensive coverage.

5 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what' (the exact stack and wiring) but contains no 'Use when...' clause or any trigger guidance, capping completeness at 3 per the rubric guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good keyword coverage with natural terms (Rust, OpenTelemetry, Maple, tracing crate, HTTP exporter), but misses common variations a user would naturally say such as 'telemetry', 'observability', 'OTLP', or 'traces/metrics/logs'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Rust OpenTelemetry style for Maple' carves a clear niche — one vendor, one language, one specific instrumentation stack — with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
MapleTechLabs/maple
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.