onboarding-cro

When the user wants to optimize post-signup onboarding, user activation, first-run experience, or time-to-value. Also use when the user mentions "onboarding flow," "activation rate," "user activation," "first-run experience," "empty states," "onboarding checklist," "aha moment," "new user experience," "users aren't activating," "nobody completes setup," "low activation rate," "users sign up but don't use the product," "time to value," or "first session experience." Use this whenever users are signing up but not sticking around. For signup/registration optimization, see signup-flow-cro. For ongoing email sequences, see email-sequence.

1.00x

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

92%

1.00x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, token-efficient advisory skill with a clean one-level-deep reference structure. It would score higher if its workflow included explicit validation checkpoints and its guidance moved from strategic principles toward more directly executable procedures.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation/verification checkpoints to the audit workflow (e.g., confirm the activation event is measurable before recommending changes, re-check funnel math after proposing fixes) to lift workflow_clarity.

Convert key strategic principles into concrete, copy-paste-ready artifacts — e.g., a fill-in onboarding-audit template and sample empty-state copy — to strengthen actionability.

Surface the references/experiments.md link earlier (e.g., in the Experiment Ideas intro and the Output Format) so the deeper material is discoverable from more entry points.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and scannable (tables, terse bullets like 'Interactive > Tutorial. Doing the thing > Learning about the thing.') with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place.	3 / 3
Actionability	It provides concrete specifics ('3-7 items,' 'Max 3-5 steps per tour,' '24h, 72h,' and an output template 'Finding → Impact → Recommendation → Priority') but much remains strategic principle rather than copy-paste-ready executable procedure, matching the score-2 anchor.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clear sequenced flow exists (Initial Assessment → Define Activation → Flow Design → Measurement → Experiments) but no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops, matching the score-2 'sequence present but checkpoints missing' anchor.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	A clear overview with one well-signaled, one-level-deep reference to a real references/experiments.md (verified to exist with no nested .md references), matching the score-3 anchor.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

90%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with excellent natural trigger coverage, explicit what-and-when guidance, and clear disambiguation from adjacent skills. Its only weakness is naming the domain without listing concrete actions the skill performs.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('optimize post-signup onboarding, user activation, first-run experience, or time-to-value') but does not enumerate concrete actions like the score-3 anchor ('extract text', 'fill forms'), so it lands at 'names domain and some actions, not comprehensive'.	2 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('optimize post-signup onboarding, user activation…') and when ('Also use when the user mentions…,' 'Use this whenever users are signing up but not sticking around'), matching the score-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Excellent coverage of natural phrases users would say ('onboarding flow,' 'activation rate,' 'aha moment,' 'users aren't activating,' 'nobody completes setup,' 'time to value'), matching the score-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Clear post-signup onboarding niche with distinct triggers and explicit disambiguation ('For signup/registration optimization, see signup-flow-cro. For ongoing email sequences, see email-sequence.'), making wrong-skill triggering unlikely.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: MapleTechLabs/maple
Path: .agents/skills/onboarding-cro/SKILL.md
Commit: 8d347f8

Reviewed: about 13 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.