agency-grid-layout-minimal

Create a minimal agency design system with a disciplined editorial grid, oversized typography, quiet uppercase utility labels, restrained image blocks, and subtle structural detail.

Quality

53%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./agent-skills/web-design/agency-grid-layout-minimal/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

57%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill body is a well-organized, single-purpose design-direction reference with strong sectioning, but it is padded with redundant aesthetic restatements, offers more vibe than concrete executable specifics, and leaves its Workflow section empty. Tightening and adding concrete values would meaningfully raise its quality.

Suggestions

Fill in or remove the empty '## Workflow' section; for a full design-system direction, sequence the work (e.g., establish the grid, then type scale, then image framing, then motion) with checkpoints.

Replace abstract vibes with concrete tokens/values: specify grid column counts and gutters, headline-to-body type-scale ratios, max-widths, and actual button/CSS patterns instead of adjectives like 'oversized' and 'restrained'.

De-duplicate the recurring 'minimal/restrained/quiet/subtle' guidance across Visual target, Implementation guidance, and Recommended patterns so each section earns its tokens with distinct information.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body avoids basic-concept fluff and assumes Claude's intelligence, but the same adjectives ('minimal', 'restrained', 'quiet', 'subtle') and ideas (oversized headlines, tiny metadata, neutral backgrounds, thin separators) recur across Visual target, Implementation guidance, and Recommended patterns, so it could be tightened.	2 / 3
Actionability	It offers some concrete, applicable guidance (gradient-border buttons, masked text reveals, wide max-width shells) but mostly describes a vibe ('feel editorial', 'let imagery feel architectural and premium') without concrete values like column counts, type-scale ratios, or actual component tokens, leaving key details missing.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The '## Workflow' section is literally empty, and although the single aesthetic direction is clear, there is no sequenced process or checkpoints for applying a full design-system direction; this fits 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit' and is not the blank-wall level-1 case because the scope is clear.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	As a self-contained ~50-line single-purpose skill with no bundle files, it is well-organized into clear sections (Use When, Scope, Visual target, Implementation guidance, Recommended patterns, Tuning knobs, Avoid) with easy navigation, satisfying the simple-skills exception.	3 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concrete and specific about the design direction it produces, but it lacks any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance and leans on design jargon over natural user phrasing. It is a solid, distinctive-enough description that stops short of being fully actionable as a trigger.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms (e.g., 'Use when building a minimal agency, architecture, or strategy firm website with an editorial grid and oversized typography').

Include common user phrasings alongside the design vocabulary (e.g., 'agency website', 'minimal design', 'editorial layout') to improve trigger-term coverage.

Clarify the concrete actions the skill performs (e.g., 'Lay out pages on a multi-column grid, set oversized headlines, and frame architectural image blocks') rather than only describing the resulting aesthetic.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names a concrete design domain with specific elements ('disciplined editorial grid, oversized typography, quiet uppercase utility labels, restrained image blocks'), but these are descriptive adjectives of one output rather than multiple distinct executable actions, matching the 'names domain and some actions' anchor.	2 / 3
Completeness	The description states clearly what the skill produces but provides no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, so per the rubric it is capped at 2 ('has what, but when is missing or only implied').	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Terms like 'agency design system', 'editorial grid', and 'oversized typography' are relevant but design-jargon heavy and miss common user variations ('agency website', 'minimal design', 'editorial layout'); no explicit trigger phrasing is present.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The minimal editorial-agency aesthetic is a reasonably specific niche, but as a design-direction skill it could still overlap with sibling agency/design-system skills, fitting 'somewhat specific but could still overlap.'	2 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: MengTo/Skills
Path: agent-skills/web-design/agency-grid-layout-minimal/SKILL.md
Commit: 46abf78

Reviewed: about 7 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.