Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An instruction-only audit skill that is lean, highly actionable, and well-sequenced with a per-finding validation gate and a concrete output template. Structure is clean with a single appropriately signaled external reference, so all dimensions score at the top of the scale.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it lists flag categories, a removal test, priorities, and an output template without explaining what gradients, cards, or glass effects are. Every section earns its place with no padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout: enumerated flag patterns ("card treatment applied to nearly every content block", "unclear or competing primary actions"), a five-step Removal Test, a defined P0–P3 priority scheme, and a copy-paste-ready output template with a worked table row. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced audit process (Audit the Evidence → Classify → What to Flag → Removal Test → Prioritize → Output) with the Removal Test acting as an explicit per-finding validation gate and the "Mark anything outside ... evidence as unknown" checkpoint plus an Unknowns output section. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with a single, well-signaled one-level-deep reference ("read [../no-ai-design-slop/ARTICLE.md] and use only the catalog sections relevant to the inspected artifact") and no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |