Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concrete, executable, and well-organized with a solid verification checklist, assuming Claude's competence throughout. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: the closing references to demo/ files resolve to nothing on disk.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced demo/index.html and demo/PROMPT.md bundle files so the closing links resolve, or remove the references and keep the skill self-contained.
If demo/ assets are intentionally omitted here, replace the links with a note that the demo must be generated rather than a clickable path that 404s.
Tighten a few explanatory sentences (e.g. the 'State the cost honestly' opener) to push conciseness toward a lean 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — code and a defaults table dominate, and prose like 'A timer emitter leaves dots behind a fast flick' conveys non-obvious failure modes rather than padding; a few explanatory sentences could still be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides executable JS and GLSL snippets plus concrete numbers (pool 620, spacing 7, 40–60 burst spawns) and a defaults table, but they are instructive fragments rather than a complete copy-paste file. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections sequence the build (resolve plane → emit → recycle → reuse → lifecycle → cost) and close with an explicit 'Verify' checklist of checkpoints; minor validation gaps remain before it reads as a full feedback-loop workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is reasonably sectioned but ends by pointing to demo/index.html and demo/PROMPT.md, and no such bundle files (nor references/scripts/assets) exist — the references are dead links, so navigation is not actually one-level-deep and reachable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |