Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and gives concrete, actionable design-system direction without padding, but an empty Workflow heading and some cross-section repetition prevent it from being fully tight.
Suggestions
Remove or populate the empty '## Workflow' heading rather than leaving a placeholder section.
Deduplicate the framing vocabulary ('inset rules', 'corner markers', 'thin/fine frame lines') that repeats across Visual target, Implementation guidance, and Recommended patterns.
Replace the verbatim description repetition under 'Use When' with concrete triggering scenarios instead of restating the capability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's intelligence (no basic-concept explanations) and is mostly lean, but the description is repeated verbatim under 'Use When' and framing ideas ('inset rules', 'thin frame/fine frame lines', 'corner markers') recur across Visual target, Implementation guidance, and Recommended patterns, so not every token earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific for an instruction-only design skill: named layout primitives ('flex-row', split columns, two-panel grid), named metadata treatments ('top rails, metadata strips, labels, coordinates, system markers'), and concrete defaults ('50/50 by default'); per the rubric's instruction-only note, absence of code is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Although this is a single-purpose design skill where a multi-step workflow is not strictly required, the '## Workflow' section heading is present but empty, leaving structure incomplete; the well-organized surrounding sections keep it above the lowest anchor but the empty workflow gap prevents a top score. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, the skill is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Scope, Visual target, Implementation guidance, Recommended patterns, Tuning knobs, Avoid), satisfying the rubric's simple-skills allowance for a top progressive-disclosure score on well-organized sections alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |