Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, expert-level body: failure-mode-driven sections, real constants, and a genuine end-of-work checklist. The main deductions are that several code snippets are illustrative fragments dependent on surrounding code, and the ~170-line single file has no overview-to-detail split despite being well sectioned.
Suggestions
Complete the elided code fragments — especially blizzardAt()'s 'smoothstep in, hold, out' body and the undefined camAz/cam references in anchor() — so snippets are copy-paste runnable, or explicitly flag them as excerpts from a full working pattern.
Convert the section ordering into an explicit numbered build sequence (anchor volume -> density -> storm -> lightning -> blizzard -> settled snow -> wet ground -> ambience) so the workflow is unambiguous beyond the final checklist.
The body sits at roughly 170 lines; consider moving the audio-looping crossfade and wet-ground details into a reference file to keep SKILL.md as a leaner overview, which would also give the skill proper progressive-disclosure structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section opens with a concrete failure mode and resolves into a tight code snippet or a numeric dial table; nothing re-explains Three.js or basic concepts ('Float32BufferAttribute copies your array... Symptom: everything is correct, nothing moves'). Matches the 5 anchor 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'; no section is trimmable without losing actionable content. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly concrete — exact constants ('0.42 + near * 0.58', 'slant = base * v * v', 'dt / 24') and a storm-vs-rain dial table — but several snippets are fragments rather than copy-paste code: blizzardAt() elides its body ('... // smoothstep in, hold, out'), anchor() depends on undefined camAz/cam, and strike() references external sfx/pulses. This fits the 4 anchor 'mostly executable guidance; concrete code with minor gaps' rather than 5's 'fully executable, copy-paste ready'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections form a coherent build order and the closing 'What to check before you call it done' is an explicit per-feature validation checklist (watch a single drop, two minutes in snow, five clear-to-snow entries, profile the storm). However there is no ordered step sequence and no error-recovery feedback loop, so it sits at 4 ('clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps') rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a single self-contained file with clear, well-scoped section headers and no nested or buried references (no bundle files exist to reference). All content is appropriately inline, though at roughly 170 lines it is near the upper limit of what belongs in one file — good structure with minor organization headroom, matching the 4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |