Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-structured, and has clear sequencing with a validation checkpoint, but actionability is held back by a vague branch-creation instruction and the absence of a concrete commit-message example.
Suggestions
Give an exact branch-creation command, e.g. 'git checkout -b feat/<short-description>'.
Include one concrete example commit message following the 'type(scope): description' format to make the convention copy-paste ready.
Show the exact commit command form (e.g. git commit -m "...") so the 'plain string, no HEREDOC' guidance is directly executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, giving concrete git commands without explaining what git is or padding with background; every line earns its place, matching the level-3 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete state-checking commands (git status, git diff HEAD, git log --oneline -10), but branch creation is left vague ('create a new feature branch using git branch') and the conventional-commit format has no concrete example message, leaving guidance incomplete rather than copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced 1-5 and include an explicit validation checkpoint ('Run checks first... Stop if any checks fail'), which is a level-3 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' rather than the level-2 'checkpoints missing or implicit' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed and is organized into clearly labeled sections (Arguments, Steps); per the simple-skills scoring note this is a level-3 well-organized overview. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |