CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

get-started

Guide users through the get started setup and Chrome DevTools demo.

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.opencode/skills/get-started/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a model of lean, executable instruction writing: exact reply text, literal triggers, a named MCP tool, and a defined confirmation step, all in thirteen lines. Its only weakness is inherited from the frontmatter — the description undersells this clarity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The 13-line body is pure instruction with zero padding: "Reply with these four lines, exactly and in order" followed by the literal lines. Nothing explains concepts Claude already knows, and every token drives behavior. Clear anchor 5; not anchor 4 since there is nothing to trim.

5 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable guidance: the exact four-line reply is given verbatim, the trigger phrase is literal ("go on google.com" or "hey go on google.com"), the specific tool is named ("use the chrome-devtools MCP"), and the follow-up format "I'm on <site>" has its placeholder explicitly resolved ("the final URL or page title"). Anchor 5, not 4 — there are no gaps.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple skill (under 50 lines, single task) whose action is unambiguous: reply with four lines, then on the "go on google.com" trigger navigate and confirm. Per the simple-skill guideline, workflow clarity can score 5 without an explicit multi-step workflow, and no destructive/batch operations require validation checkpoints. It fits anchor 5, not anchor 4, since "After the navigation completes" already supplies the one checkpoint the task needs.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and is organized into three clear sections ("When to use", "What to do", "Then"). Per the guideline for small skills, this earns anchor 5; no bundle files exist and none are referenced, so nothing is buried or inlined that should be split out.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

45%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description names its domain but relies on a single generic verb and omits any "use when" trigger guidance, which caps completeness. It reads as a vague charter for the skill rather than a self-contained, triggering description. Concrete actions and trigger phrases from the body should be surfaced into it.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when the user says 'get started' or asks to begin the setup/onboarding demo."

Replace the generic "Guide users through" with the skill's concrete actions, e.g. "Deliver the OpenWork welcome message, then open requested sites (e.g. google.com) via the chrome-devtools MCP and confirm the final URL."

Narrow the very common phrase "get started" by pairing it with distinctive terms like "OpenWork onboarding" or "Chrome DevTools demo" to reduce conflict risk with other getting-started skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Guide users through the get started setup and Chrome DevTools demo" names the domain but the action is a single generic verb ("guide users through") — no concrete actions like the welcome reply or opening sites via chrome-devtools MCP appear. It matches anchor 2 ("Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic"), not anchor 3, which requires 1-2 concrete stated actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is stated but only moderately clear ("guide users through" the setup and demo), and the "when" is entirely absent — there is no "Use when..." clause, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines. Not anchor 2 because the what does name concrete domains rather than being pure fluff.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"get started" and "Chrome DevTools" are natural phrases a user might say, but common variations (onboarding, demo, browser navigation, google.com) are absent. Fits anchor 3 ("Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms"), below anchor 4's "good keyword coverage".

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Chrome DevTools" is distinctive, but "get started" is an extremely common phrase that would overlap with virtually any onboarding/getting-started skill. Somewhat specific but with real overlap risk, matching anchor 3.

3 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

Mirxa27/arabclue

Path

.opencode/skills/get-started/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.