Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and clearly sequenced with strong validation checkpoints and a properly organized reference layer. Its main weakness is conciseness — substantial repetition across the principles, examples, and eval sections inflates the token budget without adding new guidance.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the repeated before/after pairs: keep one canonical example per principle and remove the re-treads in Quick Examples and the Success Criteria section.
Move the full Quick Transformation Examples block and the Prompt Quality Eval rubric into a reference file, keeping only a pointer in SKILL.md.
Consolidate the Transformation Checklist and Quick Prompt Quality Check into a single checklist to avoid redundant scoring guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~494-line body repeats the same before/after pairs ("fix the login bug", "the API error") in the principles, Quick Examples, and Success Criteria sections, and the Quick Prompt Quality Check duplicates the checklist — accurate but padded with redundancy. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready before/after examples, explicit "what to add" tables, and a step-by-step transform workflow — fully executable guidance rather than abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences the flow clearly (mode selection → apply 5 principles → output → checklist) with validation checkpoints, and the context-first path spells out parallel agents plus post-synthesis steps. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are well-signaled and one-level-deep with all five referenced files present, but the body keeps large inline content (10 Quick Transformation Examples, a second eval rubric) that duplicates references/before-after-examples.md and should live in a separate file. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |