Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, concise, and highly actionable, with a clear gated workflow and concrete templates. Minor gains are available from trimming template redundancy and tightening the assumption-rejection recovery path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is tight and actionable with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the only minor excess is slight redundancy between the workflow bullets and the question-templates block. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: numbered questions, lettered multiple-choice options, a reply-format code block, and a 'reply defaults' fast-path, fully covering common cases for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (decide → ask → pause → confirm) with explicit gating checkpoints and a proceed-with-assumptions confirmation loop; the only gap is an under-specified 'assumptions rejected' recovery path. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the content is self-contained with well-organized section headers (Goal, Workflow, Templates, Anti-patterns); it slightly exceeds the simple-skill line count threshold, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |