Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable instruction skill: lean prose, concrete commands, and clean delegation to sibling skills and the style guide. The only gap is the absence of a final validation/verification step for the batch bilingual update.
Suggestions
Add an explicit final verification step in the workflow, e.g. confirm both locales are in sync and that all affected pages were updated before completing.
Optionally include a quick check that the VitePress build still passes after doc edits to catch broken links or frontmatter.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: uses git commands without explaining them and assumes Claude's competence; the repo-specific doc structure and changelog-flow rules earn their place as non-obvious context. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully concrete, executable guidance — exact git commands, a runnable sync script, specific file paths, named doc sections, and neutral placeholder examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with decision gates ('say so and stop', prerequisites stop) exists, but there is no final verification step for this batch operation (multi-page, two-locale updates), which caps the score at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (docs/AGENTS.md, translate-docs and audit-docs skills) and no nested pointer chains; detail is appropriately delegated. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |