Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced process, concrete deliverables, and a useful example output format. Its main limitation is mild abstraction in the inventory-listing step and the absence of any verification checkpoint for the produced analysis.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; the skill-design criteria and example output format earn their place, with only minor room to tighten the example block. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete sequenced guidance with a specific per-group deliverable list and an example output format; the "scan the configured skill roots" step is slightly abstract, leaving a minor gap versus fully executable instruction. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step Process with concrete sub-bullets and an explicit stop boundary ("Do not edit any file"); the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply to this read-only proposal task, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints for the analysis itself. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized sections (When to use, Process, Criteria, Example output format), meeting the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |