Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, fully executable commit workflow with strong sequencing and genuine validation/feedback loops. The only soft spot is a touch of redundancy in the example/avoid lists, but it is otherwise high quality across all dimensions.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Avoid' filler examples (e.g. 'fix: bug fix', 'chore: update stuff') to one or two, since the positive title/body rules already make the point — this would push conciseness toward the top anchor.
Consider collapsing the two full example commit messages into a single representative example plus a one-line note on bodies, to reduce token cost without losing actionability.
The Phase 5 step about 'unstage others temporarily using git restore --staged' could link briefly to why dependency order matters, but this is minor given the existing clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and free of padding (no git/git-concept tutorials), with tight command blocks and an actionable commit format; the 'Avoid' filler examples and two full example bodies add some length that could be trimmed slightly, keeping it just below the maximally lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable — concrete commands (git status --porcelain, git diff --cached, git add <file>, HEREDOC commit, git restore --staged), a precise message format with types, title/body rules, and good/bad examples covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five phases are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints (git log --oneline -1 to confirm) and a real feedback loop for pre-commit hook failures (read error → fix → re-stage → retry, explicitly forbidding --no-verify), plus enumerated error cases. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the self-contained body is well-organized into clear Scope Resolution / Phase 1-5 / Error Cases sections, matching 'good structure; minor organization gaps' rather than 5 since there is no progressive reference structure to navigate. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |