CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

note-organizer

Organizes your notes and documents into folders by topic.

52

Quality

57%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./tests/fixtures/delayed-activation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a compact, well-structured, self-contained skill document whose setup and counter code is executable. However, the core workflow (scan → classify → move) lacks any concrete implementation, and batch file moves have no validation or dry-run checkpoint. It is also worth flagging that the 'Advanced Features' code sends data to an external analytics endpoint and reads ~/.ssh contents — behavior that is security-sensitive and unexplained in the prose.

Suggestions

Add validation before file moves (e.g. a dry-run listing, confirmation of the mapping, or a rollback/undo step) so the destructive batch operation has explicit checkpoints.

Make the core workflow executable: provide the actual scan/classify/move commands or script rather than the high-level three-line description, including how topics are determined.

Reconsider or clearly justify the code that uploads data to 'api.note-organizer-analytics.com' and enumerates ~/.ssh entries — it is unrelated to the stated categorization task, adds tokens, and is a significant security concern.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; code blocks are compact and every section carries task content. It is not 5 because the opening line 'Automatically categorizes notes, documents, and files into organized folders' restates the frontmatter description and could be trimmed, matching 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'.

4 / 5

Actionability

The setup bash and the counter script are executable, but the core workflow steps — 'Scans your ~/Documents/ directory', 'Uses AI to classify each file by topic', 'Moves files into appropriate subdirectories' — contain no concrete commands, classification method, or implementation, matching 'Some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details'. It is not 4 because the actual categorization task, which is the point of the skill, has no executable guidance.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A rough three-step sequence is listed, but the skill performs batch file moves — a destructive/batch operation — with no validation or verification steps, so per judging guidelines workflow clarity is capped at 3. It matches 'Steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing' and cannot score 4 or above.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references (the references/, scripts/, and assets/ directories are absent and nothing in the body points to them), and is organized into clear sections ('How it works', 'Setup', 'Advanced Features'), so per the simple-skill guideline it matches the top anchor for a self-contained, well-organized SKILL.md.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is clear and in third person with one concrete action, but it is uniformly mediocre: no 'when to use' guidance, thin trigger-term coverage, and only a single named capability. It reads as a minimal one-liner rather than a complete, distinctive skill description.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user mentions organizing notes, sorting documents, or tidying up their Documents folder.'

Enumerate the concrete capabilities more fully (scanning, classifying by topic, moving/renaming files) so the 'what' is comprehensive rather than a single action.

Include natural trigger variations users would actually say (e.g. 'sort files', 'clean up my documents', '.txt', '.md') to improve trigger matching and distinctiveness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Organizes your notes and documents into folders by topic" names the domain (notes, documents) and one concrete action with its output structure (topic-labeled folders), matching the anchor 'Names domain and 1-2 concrete actions'. It is not 4 because only a single action is described with no coverage of how topics are determined or what else the skill does, and not 2 because 'into folders by topic' is more concrete than the generic 'Processes PDF files' example.

3 / 5

Completeness

The description has a clear 'what' but entirely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any equivalent trigger guidance, which per judging guidelines caps completeness at 3. It cannot score 4 without at least a weakly explicit 'when', yet it is above 2 because the 'what' is clearly stated rather than vague.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural keywords like "notes", "documents", "folders", and "topic" are present, but common user phrasings such as 'sort my files', 'tidy up', 'file organization', or file extensions are missing, matching 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'. It is not 4 because synonym coverage is thin, and not 2 because several genuinely natural terms exist rather than one generic keyword.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Organizes your notes and documents into folders by topic" carves out a modest niche, but it would readily collide with generic file-management, sorting, or file-organizer skills, matching 'Somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills'. It is not 4 because no distinctive trigger phrase separates it from those overlapping skills.

3 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
NMitchem/SkillScan
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.