CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

nemotron-super3

Reference desk for NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super — architecture, training data, recipes (pretrain/SFT/RL/eval/quantization), and deployment notes. Use when the user asks facts about Super3 rather than building a pipeline.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable knowledge-base skill with explicit workflows, exact file/config paths, and a clear routing table. Its main weakness is redundancy: routing logic and the paper-vs-open-recipe caveat are restated across multiple sections and could be consolidated.

Suggestions

Consolidate 'Source hierarchy' and 'When to cross-link files' into the 'Core workflow' routing table — they restate the same file-to-question mappings.

State the paper-vs-open-recipe parity caveat once and reference it elsewhere; it currently appears in both 'Source hierarchy' and 'Known caveats'.

Trim the four calibration examples to two (e.g. one architecture, one reproduction) — they illustrate the same citation discipline already specified in the 'Cite' section.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

It assumes Claude's competence — no elementary explanations of Mamba/MoE/quantization — but restates routing across 'Core workflow', 'Source hierarchy', and 'When to cross-link files', and repeats the paper-vs-open-data parity caveat in both 'Source hierarchy' and 'Known caveats'.

2 / 3

Actionability

Gives exact file paths and config names (e.g. 'src/nemotron/recipes/super3/stage0_pretrain/config/long_context_1m.yaml'), concrete stage orders (RLVR 1 → RLVR 2 → RLVR 3 → SWE 1 → SWE 2 → RLHF), and specific numbers (21 environments, 99.8% median accuracy).

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Sequences work explicitly as Locate → Retrieve → Cite with ordered sub-steps, a question-to-file routing table, a source-disagreement branching rule ('If two sources disagree... say both, explain why'), and a Do/Don't checklist.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A clear overview pointing one level deep to well-signaled files (paper/*.md, recipes/*.md, model-card.md, context/quick-reference.md) with a routing table for navigation. The referenced bundle files are not present in this fixture, so the paths could not be verified on disk.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it names a specific model, enumerates concrete coverage areas, includes natural trigger terms, and gives an explicit 'Use when' clause that disambiguates it from a sibling pipeline-building skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Enumerates multiple concrete coverage areas — 'architecture, training data, recipes (pretrain/SFT/RL/eval/quantization), and deployment notes' — going beyond a single domain to list several specific capabilities.

3 / 3

Completeness

States what it does ('Reference desk for NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super...') and when to use it ('Use when the user asks facts about Super3 rather than building a pipeline'), satisfying both with an explicit trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes the natural product terms a user would say ('NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super', 'Super3') plus domain terms (pretrain/SFT/RL/eval/quantization) and a natural trigger phrasing ('facts about Super3').

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Names a highly specific model and disambiguates from a neighboring skill ('rather than building a pipeline'), giving it a clear niche unlikely to trigger the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
NVIDIA-NeMo/Nemotron
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.