Publish or update a NemoClaw pull request and follow its CI and automated reviews to completion.
61
77%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/nemoclaw-contributor-create-pr/SKILL.mdPublish the requested NemoClaw change and follow required CI and scheduled automated reviews until one unchanged latest PR commit has a complete disposition. A successful push alone is not completion. Preserve the user's scope and any explicit instruction to stop at a draft or withhold approval.
nemoclaw-contributor-implement-issue, then apply the
validation and publication references. These are stages of the same authorized task.Use the canonical NVIDIA/NemoClaw base, template, sensitive-path policy, and trusted validation
surface described in the references. Publish from a clean feature branch. Every published commit
must be GitHub Verified; the PR body must contain the configured identity's DCO declaration.
Before declaring the source repository, apply the trusted-base source-repository eligibility gate in Publication. Never open a fork PR when a required CI or E2E path for the candidate is restricted to same-repository pull requests.
Bind branch writes to the declared repository, branch, local commit, and expected remote state. Preserve the atomic prior-state guard, fast-forward ancestry check, and readback requirements. Reconcile inconclusive writes before any permitted bounded retry. Never infer success from a write response alone or weaken the reference's concurrency and recovery rules.
Open code-changing or sensitive-path PRs as drafts. Record available review context without claiming unobserved approval. Do not select labels or request maintainer reviews in this workflow. A workflow or live E2E file change does not require separate approval. Manual live E2E dispatch still requires authority for the selected target. Missing dispatch authority does not block draft publication unless the accepted scope requires that live evidence before publication. When the diff adds, expands, or repairs live E2E evidence, require the implementation handoff to apply Define the Live Contract. When it prunes or relocates live assertions, require the handoff to apply Move or Remove Evidence. Route a handoff that omits any required field back to implementation before publication. Follow GitHub access for access errors and Writing and review for PR text.
Carry the original objective, accepted scope, deferred scope, tested commit, and validation evidence through repairs and publication. Continue authorized work without asking the user to restate the PR request. Ask only for a decision outside that scope or a required authorization that is still missing.
Report the PR URL, current commit, CI and automated-review results, and any remaining human decision or external blocker. Distinguish pending evidence from completed evaluation. This skill does not grant merge authority.
766cc03
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.