Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, highly operational instruction-only skill: it provides exact commands, markers, and PR syntax while cleanly delegating repo-specific conventions to named documents one level deep. The only notable gap is the absence of an explicit failure-recovery loop around the step-4 verification checks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense with every clause carrying operational rules (e.g., "Do not infer approval from a state that only records technical validation", "do not require unaffected Rust or SDK suites solely to create a signed-off commit or PR") and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. It fits the anchor 'every token earns its place' rather than 4, since there is no over-explanation to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete guidance throughout: the copy-paste-ready command "gh issue view <id> --json number,title,body,state,labels,comments", exact markers "> **🔒 security-review-agent**" and "> **🔧 security-fix-agent**", the exact "Closes #<id>" PR syntax, and a specific verification list (format, lint, compile/type checks, regression tests, E2E lane). It is not 4 because nothing is left vague — delegation to named files (CONTRIBUTING.md sections, create-github-pr) is explicit signaling, not a gap. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with explicit checkpoints: stop conditions ("If the review is missing or found the issue not actionable, stop and report"), review verification ("Verify the review against current code"), and pre-PR verification in step 4. It falls short of the 5 anchor because there is no explicit feedback loop for verification failures (no 'if checks fail, fix and re-run' instruction), and full error recovery is only spelled out for the review-missing case. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and a well-organized numbered structure; all references ("Label Discovery in CONTRIBUTING.md", "Branch Names in CONTRIBUTING.md", "create-github-pr", "openshell-crypto", the crypto architecture link) are clearly signaled and exactly one level deep. Per the rubric's under-50-lines exception, this earns the top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |