Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent operational skill: fully executable commands, a clearly sequenced two-day workflow with explicit approval and verification checkpoints, and lean project-specific content. Structure and one-level-deep external references make it easy to navigate with nothing inlined that belongs elsewhere.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with project-specific operational detail and never explains concepts Claude already knows; even the one flag aside ('The `-c` and `/dev/null` keep `git` from signing the tag and opening an editor') covers a non-obvious incantation and earns its tokens, matching the lean/efficient anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step is backed by copy-paste-ready shell with defined placeholders (RUN=<run-id>, TAG=vX.Y.Z-pre.N, PREV, NEXT_SHA), concrete gh/git/jq commands, and fill-in post templates, covering the common cases including failure paths. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Monday steps 1-4 and Tuesday steps 1-6 are numbered, cross-referenced, and gated by explicit approval checkpoints ('with the exact command and target SHA'), with a verification step (gh run watch --exit-status, release assets, PyPI) and a Recovery table mapping symptoms to actions as feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single cohesive checklist with no bundle files to split; sections are clearly organized (usage table, guardrails, background, setup, day-by-day steps, recovery) and deeper material (RFC 0014, release-version-selection, CI.md, related skills) is linked one level deep and clearly signaled in the Related section. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |