Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean, instruction-only skill: concrete commands, explicit authorization checkpoints, conditional handling of actionable vs non-actionable findings, and clear boundaries on what the agent must not decide. The only refinements would be a severity scale reference and a fuller example of the posted review comment.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient with zero padding: every sentence encodes a non-obvious constraint Claude could not infer (e.g. 'Do not file or expand a vulnerability in a public issue; follow SECURITY.md', 'Do not introduce agent:* workflow labels'). No concept explanations are present, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: a copy-paste-ready command ('gh issue view <id> --json title,body,state,labels,comments'), a concrete comment marker ('> **🔒 security-review-agent**'), and explicit routing to fix-security-issue. Minor gaps keep it below 5 — the severity step says only 'give a severity with rationale' with no scale or example, and only the comment's opening marker is specified rather than a full comment skeleton. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints ('Verify that this is an authorized security issue and that a prior review does not already answer the request') and conditional branches ('If actionable... If not actionable...', 'Post the review only when the request authorizes posting'). It falls short of the anchor 5 example only in lacking an explicit error-recovery path stating what to do when authorization cannot be verified. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple sub-50-line skill with a well-organized intro plus '## Assess' numbered workflow and clearly signaled one-level references to SECURITY.md and CONTRIBUTING.md; per the rubric's simple-skill note, no external reference files are needed and the structure earns a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |