Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-targeted set of authoring principles that respects token budget and gives specific per-node criteria. It loses points for lacking a sequenced authoring workflow with an explicit continuity-validation step, and for failing to link the existing branch-state-craft.md reference from the body.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered authoring workflow with an explicit validation/feedback checkpoint — e.g. "1. Confirm premise/boundaries → 2. Map branch tree → 3. Define flags → 4. Verify node legibility and state continuity → 5. Confirm each ending expresses the accumulated path; fix and re-check on failure".
Link the existing reference from the body, e.g. add a "## Branch and state craft" section pointing to [branch-state-craft.md](references/branch-state-craft.md) so the bundle file is discoverable rather than orphaned.
Include one brief worked example (a sample node with entry condition, choice, state change, and consequence) to lift actionability from principled rules to copy-paste-ready guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean set of eight single-sentence bullets that assume Claude's competence, avoid explaining basic concepts, and contain no padding — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Each bullet gives concrete, specific directives and checklists (e.g. "entry condition, player choice, state change, later consequence, merge/no-return behavior, and reachable ending"), which is actionable guidance for an instruction-only skill, though no worked example of a node, flag, or branch structure is provided to fully close the gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The content is a clear set of authoring principles but presents no sequenced workflow (e.g. confirm premise → map branch tree → define flags → verify continuity) and no explicit validation/feedback loop; consistency rules are stated as principles rather than as checkpoints, leaving the sequence implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized and concise, but the provided bundle file references/branch-state-craft.md is never linked or signaled from the SKILL.md body, so a real reference is present yet not navigable — content that elaborates branch/state craft is orphaned rather than clearly surfaced. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |