Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise instruction skill with a clear gated workflow and concrete per-type guidance. Its main weakness is the reliance on a non-bundled conversion script, which slightly undercuts executability.
Suggestions
Either bundle scripts/convert_heavy_file.py or replace the named-script commands with self-contained, dependency-free conversion commands so the flagship guidance is directly executable.
Add an explicit extraction-quality validation loop (e.g., 'if conversion is incomplete or garbled, re-request a different format') to lift workflow clarity above 4.
Tighten the 'Problem' section and remove the restated tradeoff in Client Rules to reach a leaner conciseness score.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with no padding about basic file concepts, but the 'Problem' framing and the restated tradeoff in Client Rules ('converting first is cheaper and usually better') are minor over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete per-type artifact mapping (PDF/DOCX→markdown, PPTX→slide outline, XLSX→CSV per sheet) and named commands, but the flagship 'python convert_heavy_file.py' commands depend on a script that is not bundled, a minor executability gap partly mitigated by the documented fallback. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence from request to index to analysis, with an explicit gate ('Only then analyze') and a quality checkpoint ('any obvious extraction-quality problems') before proceeding; lacks a full validate-fix-retry loop so it stops short of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single ~50-line file with well-organized sections (Problem, Trigger Conditions, Process, Commands, Client Rules) and no need for external references, matching the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |