Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow and strong judgment rules; its main gap is the lack of a concrete example output or template to make the deliverable fully actionable.
Suggestions
Add a short example output (a sample synthesized brief skeleton) under the Output section so the deliverable format is copy-paste ready.
Include one worked mini-example showing how a contradiction is documented explicitly, to demonstrate the 'never flatten into fake consensus' rule in practice.
Add an explicit 'verify before delivering' step in the Process (e.g., re-check that every confidence marker traces to a source) to make the quality checkpoint concrete rather than implicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what synthesis or sources are, and every section (Process, Evidence and Judgment Rules, Output) earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific ('Never flatten contradiction into fake consensus', 'If the source set is thin, say the synthesis is thin'), but it stops short of a copy-paste-ready output template or example brief, leaving a key detail missing for the instruction-only analog of score 3. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The seven-step Process is clearly sequenced and includes built-in quality checkpoints (mark confidence, resolve-or-preserve disagreement, end with what remains unclear); the task is non-fragile so the absence of hard validation loops is acceptable. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained, well-organized single-file overview with clear sections and no nested references; nothing is inappropriately bundled or split, and no external references are needed. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |