Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable diagnostic workflow with clear phase sequencing and concrete rules. Minor conciseness redundancy and the absence of any reference-file split keep it from the top band.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the final-assessment output contract between the Phase 5 section and the Persistence Contract to recover tokens.
Make the validation/checkpoint steps explicit (e.g., a 'confirm intake coverage before classification' gate) to push workflow clarity higher.
Consider moving the detailed Persistence Contract artifact schemas into a short reference file so SKILL.md stays a tighter overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean procedural guidance with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, though the final-assessment output contract is restated in the Persistence Contract and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance: explicit paradigm-mapping rules with thresholds, a five-principle classification taxonomy with labels, a per-flow audit field list, and a fixed output contract. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly ordered phases with a provisional-until-audit checkpoint and a Firm-finding/Inference/Open-question labeling gate; validation is more implicit than explicit, keeping it below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly named sections with no nesting, but everything lives in one file with no external references; beyond the simple-skill threshold yet still cleanly navigable. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |