Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and actionable with a clear 7-step workflow, but it is token-heavy due to two duplicated full A3 examples and would benefit from offloading those examples into reference files for better progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Reduce duplication by keeping one compact worked example inline and moving the full examples to a references file (e.g., examples.md) to improve both conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Add an explicit validation/review checkpoint (e.g., 'review the completed A3 with the problem owner before finalizing') to strengthen workflow clarity.
Trim the repeated ASCII template headers and decorative box borders to cut token cost without losing information.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dominated by two near-identical full ASCII A3 templates (~120 lines each), which heavily pad the document relative to the lean Steps guidance; this is noticeably verbose even though accurate. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete 7-step structure, a full blank template, and two worked examples with specific guidance like 'use 5 Whys or Fishbone'; mostly actionable with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear, numbered 7-step sequence is laid out; the skill is non-destructive so the validation cap does not apply, though explicit review/checkpoint steps are absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single file with well-organized sections and no nested references, but large worked examples are inlined that could live in separate reference files; the >50-line file does not qualify for the simple-skill exception. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |