Content
37%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The actual skill instructions in the first ~220 lines are well structured — a clear sequenced workflow with environment detection rules and explicit happy/sad path validation — but the file then inlines two full official documentation pages (~2,100 lines) that should be separate reference files, devastating token efficiency and navigation. The comment-stub hook templates also undercut actionability.
Suggestions
Move the pasted 'Automate workflows with hooks' and 'Hooks reference' documentation out of SKILL.md into references/ files (e.g. references/hooks-guide.md, references/hooks-reference.md) and keep only short, clearly signaled pointers like 'See [hooks-reference.md](references/hooks-reference.md) for event schemas'.
Replace the pseudocode comment-stub Hook Templates with complete, executable scripts (or move full templates into a references/templates/ directory with one worked example inline).
Trim the ~2,100 lines of duplicated docs to the handful of facts the skill workflow actually relies on (exit-code semantics, additionalContext/suppressOutput, matcher values), cutting the file to well under 300 lines.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly 2,100 of the 2,315 lines are two complete official documentation pages ('Automate workflows with hooks' and 'Hooks reference') pasted verbatim inline, including raw HTML img tags with srcset attributes and per-tool input-schema tables Claude does not need copied into its context — squarely the 'severely verbose; heavily padded' anchor. | 1 / 5 |
Actionability | The first ~220 lines give concrete, actionable guidance (detection rules tied to real files like 'tsconfig.json', stdin/exit-code standards, happy/sad path testing), but the three 'Hook Templates' are pseudocode comment stubs ('// Read stdin JSON, check .ts/.tsx files only // Run: npx tsc --noEmit') rather than executable scripts, matching the 'pseudocode instead of executable code' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow (analyze → suggest → configure → create → test) is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (happy and sad path testing, 'Verify expected behavior', recovery steps under 'If Issues Occur'), though the recovery bullets ('Debug with detailed hook execution analysis') stay high-level where concrete commands would earn a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There is no references/ bundle at all, and ~90% of the body is documentation that clearly belongs in separate reference files but is inlined wholesale — the definition of the 'content that clearly belongs in separate files is inlined' anchor; only the top-level structure of the first 220 lines keeps this above the monolithic anchor at 1. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 10 / 20 Passed |