Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, largely actionable operational guide: concrete report formats, file paths, and copy-paste-ready record templates. Its main weaknesses are the absence of validation/verification steps around the destructive deprecate file-moves and batch evidence scan, and a Refresh branch that says what to do without how to do it.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints around the destructive Deprecate action — e.g., verify the hypothesis file exists before the `mv`, confirm the move succeeded, and verify the deprecation record was written — to lift workflow clarity above the cap.
Make the Refresh branch concrete: specify which command or procedure re-runs validation and where the fresh evidence file lands, instead of the one-line 'Re-run validation to create fresh evidence'.
Deduplicate the Three Actions table (Quick Concepts vs. Step 3) and consider moving the full deprecation/waiver record templates into a references file to tighten the main body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dominated by tables, file templates, and commands, with the key principle stated once ('Evidence is perishable. Decisions built on expired evidence carry hidden risk.'); only minor instances could be trimmed, such as the Three Actions table being duplicated between Quick Concepts and Step 3 and illustrative prose like 'A benchmark from 6 months ago may no longer reflect current system performance.' | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable: exact paths (`.fpf/evidence/`, `.fpf/knowledge/L2/`), a concrete `mv` command, and complete record templates with frontmatter for both deprecations and waivers. The Refresh branch is the one gap — 'Re-run validation to create fresh evidence' gives no procedure or pointer. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The report → present → act sequence is clearly laid out with a concrete report format, but the Deprecate action moves knowledge files (destructive) and Step 1 scans all evidence files (batch) with no verification or confirmation checkpoints, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the rubric guidelines. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-file skill with no bundle files, and it is well-sectioned with clear headers and no nested references; the full record templates inlined in Step 3 could arguably live in a references file, which is the only minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |