Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-sequenced, actionable evaluation pipeline with concrete prompt templates and validation steps. Its main weakness is redundancy between the workflow, the 13-item guidelines, and the notes, which inflates token cost without adding proportional value.
Suggestions
Fold the 'Important Guidelines' and 'Notes' sections into the relevant workflow phases to eliminate restatement and reduce length.
Make Phase 4 validation items more executable (e.g., specific checks for score-range validity and weighted-total arithmetic rather than vague 'verify' instructions).
Consider moving the large prompt templates into a references/ file referenced from the body to improve progressive disclosure for a 200-line skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient procedural guidance, but the 13-item 'Important Guidelines' and 'Notes' sections restate concepts already covered in the workflow phases, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, mostly executable guidance — full meta-judge and judge prompt templates plus Task-tool dispatch blocks with model and subagent_type — though prompts rely on placeholders and reference external agent instructions. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-phase pipeline is clearly sequenced and Phase 4 includes an explicit validation checklist with a re-evaluation feedback loop, but the validation items are high-level checks rather than executable verification commands. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (workflow, phases, scoring table, guidelines, notes) with no external bundle files needed; a 200-line single-file skill with good structure but no references to split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |