Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill delivers a genuinely executable process with concrete templates, a clear phase sequence, and a built-in verification loop. Its main weaknesses are token bloat — duplicated guidance, boilerplate re-teaching known concepts, and redundant examples — and a monolithic single-file layout that inlines large templates instead of offloading them to reference files.
Suggestions
Move the Zero-shot CoT prefix (section 4.1) and self-critique suffix (section 4.3) templates into reference files (e.g. references/cot-prefix.md and references/critique-suffix.md), keeping only their purpose and inclusion rules in SKILL.md.
Cut the 'Best Practices' section or merge it into the phases it restates — context isolation guidance already appears in the <context> block and Phase 5, and the model-selection heuristics duplicate the Phase 2 table.
Replace the four formulaic examples with one fully-worked example plus a compact table mapping task profiles to model/agent selections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~330-line body has several padded sections: the CoT prefix template re-teaches step-by-step reasoning Claude already knows, the 'Best Practices' section restates Phase 2 and Phase 5 guidance (context isolation appears three times), and four near-identical examples repeat the same dispatch pattern. This is noticeably verbose rather than the 'some tightening' of anchor 3. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | The skill provides copy-paste-ready artifacts — the CoT prefix and self-critique suffix templates, a structured task body with $ARGUMENTS, a model-selection table, and a decision tree — with only minor gaps such as the thin 'Use the Task tool' dispatch section lacking exact field syntax. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five phases are clearly sequenced (analyze, select model, match agent, construct prompt, dispatch) with an explicit feedback loop ('STOP -> FIX -> RE-VERIFY -> DOCUMENT') and an output-review checkpoint. It falls short of anchor 5 only because there is no checkpoint validating the orchestrator's own model-selection decision and the dispatch step itself is loosely specified. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers organize the content well, but no bundle files exist and roughly 120 lines of prompt templates (sections 4.1 and 4.3) are inlined where reference files belong, matching the 'content that should be separate is inline' anchor rather than the well-split structure of anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |