Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with executable commands and templates across three reset variants, but its destructive and batch operations lack validation checkpoints, capping workflow clarity. Structure is clean though the verbose archive template could be split out.
Suggestions
Add a validation checkpoint before the Hard Reset, e.g. list files to be deleted and require explicit user confirmation before running `rm -rf`.
Verify the result after batch moves in Option 3 (e.g. `ls .fpf/knowledge/L1` to confirm hypotheses moved) to create a feedback loop.
Move the full session-archive template into a references file and keep SKILL.md as an overview to tighten conciseness and improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body avoids concept over-explanation and stays actionable, but the inline session-archive template (Notes, Decision Status) is somewhat padded and could be trimmed, fitting anchor 4; it is not a 5 because not every token earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | All three options provide copy-paste-ready, executable bash (mkdir/mv/rm with `2>/dev/null || true`) and concrete report templates covering soft, hard, and decision resets, matching anchor 5's fully executable common-case coverage. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are numbered and sequenced, but the destructive Hard Reset (`rm -rf`) and batch Decision Reset lack validation/verification checkpoints, so per the guideline workflow clarity is capped at 3; it is not a 2 because a clear sequence is present. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the body is well-organized with clear Option 1/2/3 headers for a single-purpose skill; the long inline archive template is the minor organization gap that keeps it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |