test-prompt
Use when creating or editing any prompt (commands, hooks, skills, subagent instructions) to verify it produces desired behavior - applies RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to prompt engineering using subagents for isolated testing
61
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./plugins/customaize-agent/skills/test-prompt/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The required workflow described in SKILL.md only instructs creating baseline/green tests using a “Task tool” with attacker-provided scenario text, but it does not show any runtime step where outsider-authored free text from external public sources (queues/feeds/inboxes/tickets/GitHub/Jira) is automatically ingested without the tester selecting the scenario.
- Repository
- NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit
- Commit
c346eee
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.