Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is an exemplar of actionable, token-efficient skill writing: concrete commands, explicit guardrails, a validated workflow with feedback loops, and a clear report format. Its only structural note is that the always-active principles block could be split into a reference file at this length.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense project-specific policy with zero concept explanations or padding — every element (failure taxonomy with symptoms, fix rules, command examples, report template) earns its tokens and assumes Claude's competence. Not 4: there is no over-explanation left to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: concrete commands ("yarn playwright test --reporter=line -g 'transfer'"), specific fix patterns (replace waitForTimeout with getByRole, expect() web-first assertions), a failure-parsing table, and a ready-to-use report template, with fallbacks for project-specific setups. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step workflow (discover → run → categorize → fix by category → re-run and report) has explicit validation checkpoints: a unit-test gate before bug fixes are complete, a full suite re-run after fixes, and escalation of unverified failures to the user — a clear feedback loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single-file skill is well-sectioned (always-active principles vs. explicit-run workflow) with no bundle files to navigate, but at ~135 lines the always-active principles and fix rules could plausibly live in a one-level-deep reference file, and there are no well-signaled references to reward. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |