Content
7%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is essentially a data dump of trading signal statistics with no actionable guidance on how to use them. The content is highly repetitive with near-duplicate entries that differ only slightly in confidence thresholds, and signal names are truncated making them indistinguishable. It fails its stated purpose of helping decide 'whether to open a position' because it provides no decision framework, workflow, or executable logic.
Suggestions
Add a clear decision workflow: e.g., 'When evaluating an entry: 1. Check if signal success rate > X%, 2. Confirm confidence > Y%, 3. Look for corroborating signals, 4. Validate risk parameters before entering'
Deduplicate near-identical signal entries - consolidate variants of the same pattern (e.g., 'Multi-timeframe bullish alignment' appears 8+ times) into single entries with parameter ranges
Use full, distinguishable signal names instead of truncated strings ending in '...' so each entry is uniquely identifiable
Add concrete code or pseudocode showing how to programmatically evaluate these signals against current market data to produce a go/no-go entry decision
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose and repetitive. The table contains near-duplicate entries (e.g., multiple 'Multi-timeframe bullish alignment' rows with slightly different confidence values), and the Signal Details section repeats information already in the table with minimal added value. Many entries are truncated with '...' making them indistinguishable. The content could be condensed to a fraction of its size. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides no concrete, executable guidance on how to use these signals. There are no code examples, no specific commands, no decision logic, and no clear instructions on how to evaluate or combine signals when deciding whether to open a position. It's purely descriptive data without actionable steps. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no workflow defined. The skill description says 'Use when deciding whether to open a position' but provides no process for how to evaluate signals, combine them, handle conflicts between signals, or make a final entry decision. No validation steps or decision checkpoints are present. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | There is some structure with a summary table followed by detailed descriptions and a confidence guide, which shows basic organization. However, the Signal Details section only covers 5 of 30 signals (incomplete), and the truncated signal names in the table make navigation difficult. No external references are used despite the content being very long. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 5 / 12 Passed |