Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable orchestration controller with concrete templates, explicit gates, and clear stage sequencing. Its only weakness is mild redundancy across the multi-agent, task-packet, and common-failure sections.
Suggestions
State the disjoint-write-ownership rule once (in the Multi-Agent Chapter Gate) and reference it from the Task Packet section instead of repeating it.
Trim Common Failures entries that merely restate earlier gates (e.g. the sequential-writing failure duplicates the Multi-Agent Chapter Gate) to keep the list focused on genuinely distinct pitfalls.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is operational and free of concept-explaining fluff, but disjoint-write-ownership is restated in both the Multi-Agent Chapter Gate and the Task Packet section, and several Common Failures restate earlier gating rules, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete artifact paths (plan/progress.md, plan/chapter-architecture.md, plan/task-packets/), a copy-paste task-packet template, a chapter-file format with min_chars/agent/placeholders fields, and an audit template give fully executable, specific guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The S0–S5 Stage Detection table sequences work with triggers and required next skills, the Review Gates define two explicit checks with a fix-before-proceeding feedback loop, and the degraded-mode fallback ("stop and ask the user") provides clear error recovery. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the skill is a single cohesive controller with well-organized sections and no nested references, so the inline structure is appropriate for an orchestration skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |