Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and a mandatory triage/validation gate. Its main weakness is mild verbosity in the framing sections rather than any structural problem.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Why This Works' section and persona-color commentary to reduce token overhead while keeping the friction-category list.
Add a brief recovery note for when browser tools fail or the app is unreachable, to round out workflow validation.
Consider moving the Example Personas table and/or Tips into a reference file to keep SKILL.md a leaner overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient actionable guidance, but the 'Why This Works' section and persona-color framing ('automated mom test — but angry') add explanation that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction-only skill: a fill-in rant template, 6 concrete filter criteria, good/bad persona examples, and an industry persona table; minor gaps on browser-tool usage specifics. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with the mandatory pragmatism filter as an explicit validation gate, a 'zero complaints → regenerate persona' feedback loop, and a max-10-tickets constraint; minor validation gaps around tool failure recovery. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers (Steps 1-6, Tips, Example Personas, Rules) and no external references needed; over 50 lines so the simple-skill exception does not apply, but structure and navigation are good. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |