Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable tool calls, a clear sequenced workflow, robust error-recovery feedback loops, and well-structured progressive disclosure into the cua-driver pack. Its main weakness is verbosity: the background-first premise and the escalation ladder are restated across several sections and could be consolidated to respect the context budget.
Suggestions
Consolidate the escalation-ladder material: it currently appears in the workflow section, the actions table note, a full dedicated section, AND the failure-mode 'Click had no effect' row — keep one authoritative version and cross-reference it to trim several paragraphs.
Reduce repetition of the 'background / no focus steal / no virtual-desktop switch' premise, which is stated in the intro, the 'Background rules' section, and again in safety/escalation prose; state it once prominently and refer back.
Consider moving the per-platform key-shortcut table into the referenced LINUX.md / MACOS.md / WINDOWS.md deep dives, since it duplicates platform-specific detail the pack already maintains.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and dense with actionable specifics, but it runs long with repeated explanation of the verify/escalate ladder across the workflow, actions table, dedicated section, and failure-mode table, and re-states the 'background, no focus steal' premise multiple times — it could be tightened without losing clarity. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready tool calls (`computer_use(action="capture", mode="som", app="…")`, `click`, `drag`, `scroll`, etc.), real returned-structure examples, and specific commands like `hermes computer-use doctor`, meeting the score-3 'fully executable' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The canonical workflow (capture → click by index → verify) is explicitly sequenced, and the verify→escalate ladder plus the failure-mode table give explicit feedback loops (read the structured verdict, re-capture, climb rungs), satisfying the validation-checkpoint requirement even for state-changing operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is an overview focused on the Hermes-side vocabulary and clearly signals one-level-deep references into the cua-driver skill pack (MACOS.md, WINDOWS.md, LINUX.md, etc.) via an explicit install command and a listed table of what each file contains, with no nested/2+-level indirection. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |